Predictive Build Failure Analytics in CI Orchestration Pipelines Using Sequence Modeling Networks

Authors

  • Lakshmi Reddy Senior Technology Manager, GAP Inc, United States of America Author
  • Takudzwa Fadziso Associate Professor, Chinhoyi University of Technology, Zimbabwe Author
  • Deng Ying Assistant Professor of Computer Science and Engineering, Jiujiang Vocational and Technical College, Jiangxi, China Author

Keywords:

predictive analytics, CI pipelines, sequence modeling, build failure prediction, machine learning, orchestration metadata, dependency graphs, test flakiness

Abstract

Research shows complex sequence modeling networks predict CI orchestration pipeline build failures. Modern CI ecosystems create complex, rapid event streams from build logs, execution traces, dependency descriptors, test-suite artifacts, and dynamic pipeline data. Pipeline instability is indicated by multidimensional data with temporal correlations and hidden structural aspects. Recurrent sequence encoders, attention-augmented temporal classification models, and graph-informed embedding algorithms predict build failures in this integrated learning architecture. Proactive correction of historical test flakiness, dependency volatility, configuration drift, and cross-pipeline interactions reduces operational overhead, speeds developer feedback loops, and improves large-scale DevOps automation dependability. Sequence-driven predictive intelligence outperforms heuristics in early-failure detection, model generalizability, and CI prediction resilience.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. Kumar, D. N. D. Kollipara, A. H. Mohammed, S. Kumar, F. B. Mohammed, and A. Kumar, “Optimizing CI/CD Pipelines with AI-Driven Build Failure Prediction: An Empirical Study on Machine Learning Models for Early Failure Detection,” Spectrum of Engineering Sciences, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 1945–1954, Nov. 2025.

M. Shahin, M. A. Babar, and L. Zhu, “Continuous Integration, Delivery and Deployment: A Systematic Review on Approaches, Tools, Challenges and Practices,” arXiv:1703.07019, 2017.

“Build Outcome Prediction for Continuous Integration: Preventing Data Leakage in Machine Learning Models Using Pre-Execution SDLC Metrics,” Preprints.org, 2025.

G. Giray, “On the Use of Deep Learning in Software Defect Prediction,” Information and Software Technology, vol. 146, 2023.

H. S. Munir, S. Ren, M. Mustafa, C. N. Siddique, and S. Qayyum, “Attention Based GRU-LSTM for Software Defect Prediction,” PLoS ONE, vol. 16, no. 3, p. e0247444, 2021.

P. Sahatiya and H. Shah, “Deep Learning for Software Defect Prediction: An LSTM-based Approach,” International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, vol. 11, no. 9, 2023.

Y. Qiao, L. Gong, Y. Zhao, Y. Wang, and M. Wei, “DeMuVGN: Effective Software Defect Prediction Model by Learning Multi-view Software Dependency via Graph Neural Networks,” arXiv:2410.19550, 2024.

J. Ma, Y. Sun, P. He, and Z. Zeng, “GSAGE2defect: An Improved Approach to Software Defect Prediction Based on Inductive Graph Neural Network,” in Proc. ACM Symp. on SEKE, 2023.

M. Cui, “Research of Software Defect Prediction Model Based on Graph Neural Network from a Complex Network Perspective,” PMCID: PMC9601759, 2022.

Z. Ye, C. Yu, and Z. Lu, “Software Defect Prediction Model Based on AST and Deep Learning,” Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience, 2025.

R. Olowoniyi, X. Hu, I. Huda, and T. Chen, “Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Modeling Dependency-Induced Flakiness in Bazel Remote Execution Traces,” 2025.

A. Reddy Narapureddy, “AI-Driven Dynamic Dependency Graph Generation for Predictive Observability in Distributed Systems,” Int. J. Comput. Eng. Technol., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 2796–2818, 2025.

A. Vaswani et al., “Attention Is All You Need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2017.

W. Gates et al., “Learning to Fix Build Errors with Graph2Diff Neural Networks,” arXiv:1911.01205, 2019.

A. Dam, T. Pham, S. W. Ng et al., “A Deep Tree-Based Model for Software Defect Prediction,” arXiv:1802.00921, 2018.

J. Zhou et al., “Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applications,” Journal of Computational Science, 2020.

“Continuous Integration, Delivery and Deployment in ML Projects: Practitioner’s Perspective,” arXiv:2502.17378, 2025.

A. Houerbi, R. G. Chavan, D. E. Rzig, and F. Hassan, “Empirical Analysis on CI/CD Pipeline Evolution in Machine Learning Projects,” arXiv:2403.12199, 2024.

“Automating CI/CD Pipelines with Machine Learning Algorithms: Optimizing Build and Deployment Processes in DevOps Ecosystems,” Distributed Learning and Broad Applications in Scientific Research, 2025.

“Predicting Continuous Integration Build Failures Using Evolutionary Search,” Information and Software Technology, Dec. 2020

Downloads

Published

26-01-2022

How to Cite

[1]
Lakshmi Reddy, Takudzwa Fadziso, and Deng Ying, “Predictive Build Failure Analytics in CI Orchestration Pipelines Using Sequence Modeling Networks ”, Los Angeles J Intell Syst Pattern Rec, vol. 2, pp. 365–397, Jan. 2022, Accessed: Mar. 07, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://lajispr.org/index.php/publication/article/view/98